< Applications Revision as of 14:39, 14 August 2017 (view source)Tosky (talk | contribs) (→kolf)← Older edit Revision as of 14:41, 14 August 2017 (view source) Tosky (talk | contribs) (→kmouth)Newer edit → Line 74: Line 74: ==kmouth== ==kmouth== *What is the status? *What is the status? +** working; waiting on a stable QtSpeech (discussed on the [https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/distributions/2017-July/000233.html distribution list], but between having no application at all (0 users) and an application dependending on an unstable-but-almost-stable library (some users), the latter is probably better. ==kolf== ==kolf== Revision as of 14:41, 14 August 2017 Contents 1 Repos WITHOUT frameworks branch 1.1 jovie 1.2 juk 1.3 kaccessible 1.4 kppp 1.5 kremotecontrol 1.6 ksaneplugin 1.7 kfilereplace 1.8 klinkstatus 2 Repos WITH frameworks branch 2.1 kget 2.2 kimagemapeditor 2.3 kmouth 2.4 kolf 2.5 kopete 2.6 kscd 2.7 ksirk 2.8 palapeli 2.9 sweeper 2.10 zeroconf-ioslave 3 Weird repos 3.1 kmix 3.2 umbrello Repos WITHOUT frameworks branch jovie text to speech daemon Question: is this something we still need or should we just use Qt Speech? First stable QtSpeech release is 5.8 This doesn't answer the question :D [tosky] it is meant to be replaced by QtSpeech; see few blog posts from jpwhiting: https://jpwhiting.blogspot.cz/2015/02/qtspeech-progress.html https://jpwhiting.blogspot.cz/2014/10/accessibility-is-alive-qtspeech.html juk Music player Who do we ask if they want to port it? mpyne? [email protected] [email protected] Anyone else? There is initial porting work at github.com/KapiX/juk/commits/kf5 Are we able to merge work from github? If not, someone should inform the author. kaccessible Question: Do we need this or Qt5 accessibility is all we need in this regard? kppp One user "complained" at Gardening mailing list https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-gardening/2017-July/000142.html can't Network Manager / Modem Manager do this? Who do we ask if they want to port it? kremotecontrol Frontend for remote controls Who do we ask if they want to port it? mzanetti? [email protected] [email protected] Anyone else? There was already a thread on kde-utils-devel (https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2017-July/004049.html) to move it to unmaintained. ksaneplugin Not important, let it die https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/release-team/2017-August/010540.html kfilereplace Utility to assist with bulk file renaming Who do we ask if they want to port it? klinkstatus Tool to check the current status of links in a web page Who do we ask if they want to port it? As far as I remember, the original author (Paulo) was interested to do (or help with) the port Repos WITH frameworks branch kget What is the status? kimagemapeditor What is the status? [tosky] mostly working, requires some testing from people who used it more than me; a lot of kdelibs4support to be removed, but not a blocker kmouth What is the status? working; waiting on a stable QtSpeech (discussed on the distribution list, but between having no application at all (0 users) and an application dependending on an unstable-but-almost-stable library (some users), the latter is probably better. kolf What is the status? [tosky] it seems to be working; Frederik Schwarzer expressed some concerns while reviewing kdelibs4-based games about the embedded copy of Box2D, maybe it can be removed, but maybe it's not a blocker for merging frameworks into master. kopete for some reason branch is called kf5 What is the status? kscd for some reason branch is called kf5 What is the status? [tosky] mostly working, but requires more restesting; there is a pending patch for musicbrainz5 support, which is not strictly a blocker, but it should be cleaned (some cmake files can be rewritten in a simpler way, or reimported from their newer versions, or shared): https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127196/ ksirk Removed dependency on kdelibs4 on Frameworks branch Master branch has been merged with frameworks, and doesn't have dependency on kdelibs4 anymore. palapeli What is the status? [tosky] it starts, but tiles are not loaded; debug needed sweeper What is the status? - One review is open (https://phabricator.kde.org/D5677), after that the frameworks branch should be ready for merging into master. zeroconf-ioslave What is the status? [tosky] it starts, but I found it difficult to test zeroconf in general, so I'm not sure if it works or not. Weird repos kmix KF5 is in master but not default Can we make KF5 default? [tosky] a lot of work went into the pure KF5 branch ("frameworks") lately. With the last fixes by Jonathan Marten it should work; testing needed. umbrello KF5 is in master, but also has kdelibs4 code Can we remove kdelibs4 code? Retrieved from "https://community.kde.org/index.php?title=Applications/17.12_repo_drop_list_kdelibs4&oldid=77988" Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.