Promo/Dot: Difference between revisions
< Promo
No edit summary |
m (formatting) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Rules for dot-editors == | == Rules for dot-editors == | ||
#We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person | #We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person reasonably fluent in English | ||
#We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put | #We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put theinfo about the article (time to be published, reviewer) on top of the article | ||
article | |||
#We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one | #We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one | ||
#We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the | #We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent still) | ||
dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer | |||
instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I | |||
wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent | |||
still) | |||
Revision as of 17:47, 2 December 2009
- List of Ideas for DOT articles.
Rules for dot-editors
- We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person reasonably fluent in English
- We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put theinfo about the article (time to be published, reviewer) on top of the article
- We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one
- We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent still)