Applications/17.12 repo drop list kdelibs4: Difference between revisions
(→kscd) |
|||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
*for some reason branch is called kf5 | *for some reason branch is called kf5 | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] mostly working, but requires more restesting; there is a pending patch for musicbrainz5 support, which is not strictly a blocker, but it should be cleaned (some cmake files can be rewritten in a simpler way, or reimported from their newer versions, or shared): https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127196/ | |||
==ksirk== | ==ksirk== |
Revision as of 14:34, 14 August 2017
Repos WITHOUT frameworks branch
jovie
text to speech daemon
- Question: is this something we still need or should we just use Qt Speech?
- First stable QtSpeech release is 5.8
- This doesn't answer the question :D
- First stable QtSpeech release is 5.8
- [tosky] it is meant to be replaced by QtSpeech; see few blog posts from jpwhiting:
juk
Music player
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- mpyne?
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Anyone else?
- There is initial porting work at github.com/KapiX/juk/commits/kf5
- Are we able to merge work from github? If not, someone should inform the author.
kaccessible
- Question: Do we need this or Qt5 accessibility is all we need in this regard?
kppp
- One user "complained" at Gardening mailing list
- https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-gardening/2017-July/000142.html
- can't Network Manager / Modem Manager do this?
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
kremotecontrol
Frontend for remote controls
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- mzanetti?
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Anyone else?
- There was already a thread on kde-utils-devel (https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2017-July/004049.html) to move it to unmaintained.
ksaneplugin
- Not important, let it die
kfilereplace
Utility to assist with bulk file renaming
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
klinkstatus
Tool to check the current status of links in a web page
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- As far as I remember, the original author (Paulo) was interested to do (or help with) the port
Repos WITH frameworks branch
kget
- What is the status?
kimagemapeditor
- What is the status?
- [tosky] mostly working, requires some testing from people who used it more than me; a lot of kdelibs4support to be removed, but not a blocker
kmouth
- What is the status?
kolf
- What is the status?
kopete
- for some reason branch is called kf5
- What is the status?
kscd
- for some reason branch is called kf5
- What is the status?
- [tosky] mostly working, but requires more restesting; there is a pending patch for musicbrainz5 support, which is not strictly a blocker, but it should be cleaned (some cmake files can be rewritten in a simpler way, or reimported from their newer versions, or shared): https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127196/
ksirk
- Removed dependency on kdelibs4 on Frameworks branch
- Master branch has been merged with frameworks, and doesn't have dependency on kdelibs4 anymore.
palapeli
- What is the status?
sweeper
- What is the status?
- - One review is open (https://phabricator.kde.org/D5677), after that the frameworks branch should be ready for merging into master.
zeroconf-ioslave
- What is the status?
Weird repos
kmix
KF5 is in master but not default
- Can we make KF5 default?
umbrello
KF5 is in master, but also has kdelibs4 code
- Can we remove kdelibs4 code?