Incubator/Projects/Kdenlive: Difference between revisions
(Typ) |
(Added link to CI) |
||
Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
* mailing list: should migrate to KDE | * mailing list: should migrate to KDE | ||
* bugtracker: from mantis on own server to KDE's bugzilla | * bugtracker: from mantis on own server to KDE's bugzilla | ||
* continuous integration (build.kde.org) | * DONE: [http://build.kde.org/job/kdenlive_master/ continuous integration] (build.kde.org) | ||
== Sponsor Checklists == | == Sponsor Checklists == |
Revision as of 09:16, 21 October 2014
Kdenlive
Sponsor: Mario Fux <fux_AT_kde..org>
Kdenlive is an intuitive and powerful multi-track video editor, including most recent video technologies. It relies on several other open source projects, such as FFmpeg, the MLT video framework and frei0r effects. Our software was designed to answer all needs, from basic video editing to semi-professional work. More information on the Kdenlive website kdenlive.org.
Team
List the people committed to the project and actively working on it:
- Vincent Pinon
- Simon Eugster
- Till Theato
- Steve Guilford
- Jean-Nicolas Artaud
Manifesto Compliance Plan
List the actions planned to get in compliance with the manifesto. Don't hesitate to even list parts of the manifesto which don't require action and highlight why. This part will really be used as a discussion starting point with the project sponsor.
Values
Open Governance
Already open governance to some extent, anyone with a KDE account can contribute, mailing list and IRC available.
Focus point: mailing list under used?
Free Software
Mainly GPL v2, GPL v3+. Some included 3rd party library use different licenses. There were recent checks and Vincent committed some fixes (=> some old Bezier code, found in other places in KDE, is under unclear license, need feedback from people with better understanding of the topic; maybe could be rewritten if necessary)
Inclusivity
No barrier known toward the contributors.
Innovation
…
Common Ownership
Anyone can contribute directly.
End-User Focus
Functionality is already at a high level, focus is currently dedicated to reliability. Problems reported on forums and tracker are rapidly analyzed, trying to find an immediate workaround, and then fixed in the code. Mature UI still gets polished progressively.
Commitments
- Code of Conduct: KDE Community Code of Conduct
- Contributor License Agreement: none
- Established practices: CMake + Qt like most, reviewboard to send patch (no real code reviews as long as patches are small)
- Source materials hosted on KDE git infrastructure
- Online services are not on KDE infrastructure: website (some info/documentation and blogs) and bugtracker on own server, mailing list on sf.net, release source tarballs and forum on KDE
- KDE Licensing policy: ? (see point "Free Software")
- KDE branding guidelines: ?
- No patents
Proposed actions:
- website: uses drupal, hosting on KDE?
- mailing list: should migrate to KDE
- bugtracker: from mantis on own server to KDE's bugzilla
- DONE: continuous integration (build.kde.org)
Sponsor Checklists
Candidate ready
Status | Description | Notes |
---|---|---|
DONE | Project description | ... |
DONE | Project team | replies from mailing list correspond to Git activity |
IN PROGRESS | Manifesto compliance plan | requires some checks |
Incubating
Status | Description | Notes | |
---|---|---|---|
TO DO | Repository and code available (in playground) | As code is already on git.kde.org as normal project, is it worth moving it twice? Disturbing people pointing to the repo (eg Ubuntu PPA builders). But not blocking, this can be done | <{{{3}}}> |
IN PROGRESS | Mailing list available | Looking for SourceForge admin rights, if not possible just abandon old list for a new one? | |
IN PROGRESS | Website available (if applicable) | Asked for page under KDE domain, need to check about content transfer | |
IN PROGRESS | Active community | Several users are active on forums, few developers on code (hopefully more in future?!) | |
IN PROGRESS | Manifesto compliance | Who to ask help on this topic? |