Talk:Policies/Commit Policy: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
No edit summary
m (Sign unsigned comments, reformat, add title)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
== Use case for FEATURE and BUG ==
I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:?
I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:?
Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive?
Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive? {{Unsigned|19:03 10 November 2020‎ (UTC)|Bam}}
 
:Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both. {{Unsigned|22:48 12 November 2020 (UTC)|Cornelius}}
Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both.

Latest revision as of 15:17, 28 November 2023

Use case for FEATURE and BUG

I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:? Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive? —This unsigned comment is by Bam (talk) 19:03 10 November 2020‎ (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!

Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both. —This unsigned comment is by Cornelius (talk) 22:48 12 November 2020 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!