< Promo Revision as of 13:43, 30 November 2009 (view source)Jospoortvliet (talk | contribs) (Created page with '* List of Ideas for DOT articles. == Rules for dot-editors == 1. We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person good in English ...') Revision as of 17:45, 2 December 2009 (view source) Jospoortvliet (talk | contribs) Newer edit → Line 2: Line 2: == Rules for dot-editors == == Rules for dot-editors == −1. We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person good in English+#We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person good in English −2. We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put the+#We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put the info about the article (time to be published, reviewer) on top of the info about the article (time to be published, reviewer) on top of the article article −3. We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one+#We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one −4. We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the+#We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent still) still) Revision as of 17:45, 2 December 2009 List of Ideas for DOT articles. Rules for dot-editors We always make sure articles are reviewed, preferably at least by one person good in English We always announce upcoming articles on dot-editors and put the info about the article (time to be published, reviewer) on top of the article We don't do more than 1 big article a day and one small one We are kind of informal - a little joke should be possible. But the dot is professional enough not to use the term hacker but developer instead. (tricky rule, this one, it's about balance I'd say. I wouldn't want the dot to get boring but it should be kind of decent still) Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.