Krita/Docs/Bug Naming Policy: Difference between revisions

From KDE Community Wiki
< Krita‎ | Docs
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
; NEEDSINFO
; NEEDSINFO
: neither developer nor community members could reproduce this bug and need some more info from the reporter. When answering the reporter should reset this bug into UNCONFIRMED state again. After a month without a reply from a reporter the developers will close the bug as WORKSFORME
: neither developer nor community members could reproduce this bug and need some more info from the reporter. When answering the reporter should reset this bug into UNCONFIRMED state again. After a month without a reply from a reporter the developers will close the bug as WORKSFORME
User notice text:
<blockquote>
I have marked the bug as NEEDSINFO. Please test it and if you still encounter it, please add your comment and reopen the report by setting it to REOPENED state. If not, close it by adding a comment and setting RESOLVED/FIXED state.
</blockquote>


; WORKSFORME
; WORKSFORME
Line 21: Line 27:
User notice text:
User notice text:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
The developers did not find a way to reproduce the bug, so it was marked as RESOLVED/WORKSFORME. If you still encounter this bug, please add your comment and reopen this report with setting its state to REOPENED so that developers would see it.
The developers did not find a way to reproduce the bug, so it was marked as RESOLVED/WORKSFORME. If you still encounter this bug, please add your comment and reopen the report by setting it to REOPENED state.
</blockquote>
</blockquote>



Latest revision as of 09:16, 5 July 2015

Bugs stateflow

UNCONFIRMED
initially a bug comes in this state, when being triaged the bug should move either into CONFIRMED or NEEDSINFO
CONFIRMED
at least one developer or a member of Krita community managed to reproduce this bug. The bug in this state should be clear enough so the developers could reproduce it on their own computer. Please consult this guideline to check if there is enough information in the bug.
ASSIGNED
the developer took this bug but didn't manage to reproduce it yet
ASSIGNED + 'reproducible' keyword
the developer managed to reproduce this bug
NEEDSINFO
neither developer nor community members could reproduce this bug and need some more info from the reporter. When answering the reporter should reset this bug into UNCONFIRMED state again. After a month without a reply from a reporter the developers will close the bug as WORKSFORME

User notice text:

I have marked the bug as NEEDSINFO. Please test it and if you still encounter it, please add your comment and reopen the report by setting it to REOPENED state. If not, close it by adding a comment and setting RESOLVED/FIXED state.


WORKSFORME
when neither developers nor a community can reproduce the bug and the reporter cannot provide any more information. This bug can still be reopened by the users.

User notice text:

The developers did not find a way to reproduce the bug, so it was marked as RESOLVED/WORKSFORME. If you still encounter this bug, please add your comment and reopen the report by setting it to REOPENED state.

Wishes stateflow

Wish + UNCONFIRMED
a wish is reported by a user.
Wish + CONFIRMED
a wish is confirmed by the community to be a valid feature for Krita
Task + CONFIRMED + 'future_project' keyword
a wish can be considered as the next Kickstarter stretchgoal or just a nice project for developers to work on. The task should be complete enough to work on, e.g. have drafts and/or mockups