< KDevelop
Revision as of 20:05, 17 October 2012 by Scummos (talk | contribs)

KDevelop/ViennaSprint2012

Things to be discussed:

  • KDevelop as an SDK: Frameworks/Epics/KDevelop_based_SDK
  • KDevelop on Windows, anybody knows what's going on?
  • Static Analysis and KDevelop, what can we do?
  • Reusable libs/tools for C++ preprocessing, parsing, semantic analysis
    • even preprocessing lib can't be reused because it uses IndexedString which requires item repository
  • Operations
    • Mailing lists moving to KDE? What will we have to change, if anything?
    • kdevelop.org domain transfer to KDE e.V.?
  • Miha's branches
    • Can we merge yet?
    • Can we better integrate the unit tests?
  • Sven's suggested topics / things to do:
    • More default colour schemes for kate/kdevelop editor component?
    • New splash screen! :)
    • Different default settings for kate:
      • Who uses 8-width tab indent?
      • Who does not want backspace at the beginning of a line to unindent? etc.
    • fix debugger tooltips (they behave in an annoying way if the mouseover target is changed quickly)
    • Better launch config dialog! It's unusable currently.
    • add a C++/KDE application template which uses a QtDesigner .ui file?
    • Formatting of autocompletion list entries: incredibly difficult, can we get something less complicated like HTML/CSS text formatting?
    • minor: only suggest include completion entries for 1 or 2-char names if requested explicitly? I often accidentially include stuff which defines a struct called "c" or so.
    • Search in Files: The "new search" icon / button is not obvious. It looks like a settings button. Maybe give it a text, or a different icon?
    • make quickopen delay configurable? it still annoys me significantly.
  • Things I (Sven) would like to ask/discuss but which are probably not relevant for everyone:
    • discuss how to properly implement class/function aliases for scripting languages in the duchain
    • kate autocompletion API: can we get a way to mark items as "unimportant", sorting them at the very end of the list regardless of alphabetic sorting? Otherwise it's very difficult to offer 20 different entries starting with __ without being annoying.

This page was last edited on 26 October 2012, at 10:13. Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.