< KDE Visual Design Group‎ | HIG
Revision as of 12:21, 30 March 2016 by Ochurlaud (talk | contribs) (16 revisions imported)

KDE Visual Design Group/HIG/Messages


If the processing has reached an unexpected condition that needs interaction, a disruptive message alerts the user of a problem. Not any disruptive message concerns a serious problem. Sometimes, the user is just notified that proceeding is dangerous. A typical example is the “Save changes before closing?” alert box that appears when a user tries to close a module with modified content. The adequate presentation method for disruptive information is a modal message dialog.

A modal dialog is a secondary window that interrupts user's current activity and blocks interaction until user either simply acknowledge the information by clicking Ok or decides how to proceed (e.g. Yes/No). Effective error messages inform users that a problem occurred, explain why it happened, and provide a solution so users can fix the problem. Users should either perform an action or change their behavior as the result of an error message.

Modal dialogs are error-prone. An alert dialog that appears unexpectedly or which is dismissed automatically (because the user has developed a habit) will not protect from the dangerous action.



Is this the right control

  • Avoid disruptive messages; workflow maintenance and, therefore, the prevention of errors should be the primary objective.
  • Use modal dialogs only for critical or infrequent, one-off tasks that require completion before continuing. Don’t use modal error message dialogs at the normal work flow to inform or warn the user.
  • Use message panel for non-critical messages which do not require any further user interaction (typically dialogs with a single "OK" or "Close" button).
  • Create specific, actionable, user-centered error messages. Users should either perform an action or change their behavior as the result of the message.
  • Provide only a short error message and complement it by a Details button that provides more a detailed explanation in the same error dialog.
  • Follow the guidelines of dialogs in general.


Messages should be:

  • Informative and constructive:
    • Tell the user the reason for a problem and
    • help on how to solve the problem.
  • Understandable:
    • Phrase your messages clearly, in non-technical terms and avoid obscure error codes.
  • Readable:
    • User has to be able to read the message in his/her own pace, think about it, understand it.
    • It is not acceptable to add countdown timers (visible or not) or to force user to read and understand the message within a few seconds.
  • Specific instead of general:
    • If the message is reporting a problem concerning a specific object or application, use the object or application name when referring to it.
  • Polite, non-terrifying and non-blaming:
    • Avoid wording that terrifies the user ("fatal", "illegal"), blames him for his behavior, and be polite.


  • Apply confirmation button labels when no further input is required:
    • To close a warning or error message that does not require further user interaction, provide a Close button. Do not use an OK button. Users may get confused if they are asked to confirm an error.
  • Apply confirmation button labels when further interaction is required:
    • Use buttons which match the type of statement or question made in the warning or error message. For example, do no ask a Yes/No question but then provide OK/Cancel buttons.
  • Apply confirmation button labels when the user must choose between two actions to continue:
    • Use descriptive button labels instead of standard Yes/No or OK/Cancel buttons. For example, if the user must choose to continue or stop an action, provide the buttons "Continue" and "Cancel".


Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.