Difference between revisions of "Incubator/Projects/Kdenlive"

Line 79: Line 79:
 
!  width=250 | Notes
 
!  width=250 | Notes
 
|-
 
|-
{{FeatureTodo|Repository and code available (in playground)|...}}
+
{{FeatureTodo|Repository and code available (in playground)|As code is already on git.kde.org as normal project, is it worth moving it twice? Disturbing people pointing to the repo (eg Ubuntu PPA builders). But not blocking, this can be done}}
{{FeatureTodo|Mailing list available|...}}
+
{{FeatureInProgress|Mailing list available|Looking for SourceForge admin rights, if not possible just abandon old list for a new one?}}
{{FeatureTodo|Website available (if applicable)|...}}
+
{{FeatureInProgress|Website available (if applicable)|Asked for page under KDE domain, need to check about content transfer}}
{{FeatureTodo|Active community|...}}
+
{{FeatureInProgress|Active community|Several users are active on forums, few developers on code (hoepfully more in future?!)}}
{{FeatureTodo|Manifesto compliance|...}}
+
{{FeatureInProgress|Manifesto compliance|Who to ask help on this topic?}}
 
|}
 
|}

Revision as of 22:15, 3 October 2014

Kdenlive

Sponsor: Mario Fux <fux_AT_kde..org>

Kdenlive is an intuitive and powerful multi-track video editor, including most recent video technologies. It relies on several other open source projects, such as FFmpeg, the MLT video framework and frei0r effects. Our software was designed to answer all needs, from basic video editing to semi-professional work. More information on the Kdenlive website kdenlive.org.

Team

List the people committed to the project and actively working on it:

  • Vincent Pinon
  • Simon Eugster
  • Till Theato
  • Steve Guilford
  • Jean-Nicolas Artaud

Manifesto Compliance Plan

List the actions planned to get in compliance with the manifesto. Don't hesitate to even list parts of the manifesto which don't require action and highlight why. This part will really be used as a discussion starting point with the project sponsor.

Values

Open Governance

Already open governance to some extent, anyone with a KDE account can contribute, mailing list and IRC available.

Focus point: mailing list under used?

Free Software

Mainly GPL v2, GPL v3+. Some included 3rd party library use different licenses. There were recent checks and Vincent committed some fixes (=> some old Bezier code, found in other places in KDE, is under unclear license, need feedback from people with better understanding of the topic; maybe could be rewritten if necessary)

Inclusivity

No barrier known toward the contributors.

Innovation

Common Ownership

Anyone can contribute directly.

End-User Focus

Functionality is already at a high level, focus is currently dedicated to reliability. Problems reported on forums and tracker are rapidly analyzed, trying to find an immediate workaround, and then fixed in the code. Mature UI still gets polished progressively.

Commitments

  • Code of Conduct: KDE Community Code of Conduct
  • Contributor License Agreement: none
  • Established practices: CMake + Qt like most, reviewboard to send patch (no real code reviews as long as patches are small)
  • Source materials hosted on KDE git infrastructure
  • Online services are not on KDE infrastructure: website (some info/documentation and blogs) and bugtracker on own server, mailing list on sf.net, release source tarballs and forum on KDE
  • KDE Licensing policy: ? (see point "Free Software")
  • KDE branding guidelines: ?
  • No patents


Proposed actions:

  • website: uses drupal, hosting on KDE?
  • mailing list: should migrate to KDE
  • bugtracker: from mantis on own server to KDE's bugzilla
  • continuous integration (build.kde.org)

Candidate ready

Status Description Notes
DONE Project description ...
DONE Project team replies from mailing list correspond to Git activity
IN PROGRESS Manifesto compliance plan requires some checks

Incubating

Status Description Notes
TO DO Repository and code available (in playground) As code is already on git.kde.org as normal project, is it worth moving it twice? Disturbing people pointing to the repo (eg Ubuntu PPA builders). But not blocking, this can be done <{{{3}}}>
IN PROGRESS Mailing list available Looking for SourceForge admin rights, if not possible just abandon old list for a new one?
IN PROGRESS Website available (if applicable) Asked for page under KDE domain, need to check about content transfer
IN PROGRESS Active community Several users are active on forums, few developers on code (hoepfully more in future?!)
IN PROGRESS Manifesto compliance Who to ask help on this topic?

Content is available under Creative Commons License SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.