Applications/17.12 repo drop list kdelibs4: Difference between revisions
(→kppp) |
(→ksirk) |
||
(19 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
text to speech daemon | text to speech daemon | ||
* | *Ignore. it is meant to be replaced by QtSpeech; see few blog posts from jpwhiting: | ||
** | ** https://jpwhiting.blogspot.cz/2015/02/qtspeech-progress.html | ||
** | ** https://jpwhiting.blogspot.cz/2014/10/accessibility-is-alive-qtspeech.html | ||
==juk== | ==juk== | ||
Line 17: | Line 16: | ||
**Anyone else? | **Anyone else? | ||
***There is initial porting work at github.com/KapiX/juk/commits/kf5 | |||
***Are we able to merge work from github? If not, someone should inform the author. | |||
*** [tosky] the author came to #kde-devel few weeks ago, so maybe we can reping him | |||
==kaccessible== | ==kaccessible== | ||
Line 38: | Line 39: | ||
**Anyone else? | **Anyone else? | ||
* There was already a thread on kde-utils-devel (https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2017-July/004049.html) to move it to unmaintained. | |||
==ksaneplugin== | ==ksaneplugin== | ||
Line 53: | Line 55: | ||
*Who do we ask if they want to port it? | *Who do we ask if they want to port it? | ||
**As far as I remember, the original author (Paulo) was interested to do (or help with) the port | |||
=Repos WITH frameworks branch= | =Repos WITH frameworks branch= | ||
Line 64: | Line 64: | ||
==kimagemapeditor== | ==kimagemapeditor== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] mostly working, requires some testing from people who used it more than me; a lot of kdelibs4support to be removed, but not a blocker | |||
==kmouth== | ==kmouth== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] working; waiting on a stable QtSpeech (discussed on the [https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/distributions/2017-July/000233.html distribution list], but between having no application at all (0 users) and an application dependending on an unstable-but-almost-stable library (some users), the latter is probably better. | |||
==kolf== | ==kolf== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] it seems to be working; Frederik Schwarzer expressed some concerns [https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-games-devel/2017-April/013413.html while reviewing kdelibs4-based games] about the embedded copy of Box2D, maybe it can be removed, but maybe it's not a blocker for merging frameworks into master. | |||
==kopete== | ==kopete== | ||
Line 78: | Line 81: | ||
*for some reason branch is called kf5 | *for some reason branch is called kf5 | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] mostly working, but requires more restesting; there is a pending patch for musicbrainz5 support, which is not strictly a blocker, but it should be cleaned (some cmake files can be rewritten in a simpler way, or reimported from their newer versions, or shared): https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127196/ | |||
==ksirk== | ==ksirk== | ||
* | *Master branch is KF5-based as of now, needs testing | ||
==palapeli== | ==palapeli== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] it starts, but tiles are not loaded; debug needed | |||
==sweeper== | ==sweeper== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
:- One review is open (https://phabricator.kde.org/D5677), after that the frameworks branch should be ready for merging into master. | |||
==zeroconf-ioslave== | ==zeroconf-ioslave== | ||
*What is the status? | *What is the status? | ||
** [tosky] it starts, but I found it difficult to test zeroconf in general, so I'm not sure if it works or not. | |||
=Weird repos= | =Weird repos= | ||
Line 96: | Line 102: | ||
KF5 is in master but not default | KF5 is in master but not default | ||
*Can we make KF5 default? | *Can we make KF5 default? | ||
**[tosky] a lot of work went into the pure KF5 branch ("frameworks") lately. With the last fixes by Jonathan Marten it should work; testing needed. | |||
==umbrello== | ==umbrello== | ||
KF5 is in master, but also has kdelibs4 code | KF5 is in master, but also has kdelibs4 code | ||
*Can we remove kdelibs4 code? | *Can we remove kdelibs4 code? |
Revision as of 22:53, 14 August 2017
Repos WITHOUT frameworks branch
jovie
text to speech daemon
- Ignore. it is meant to be replaced by QtSpeech; see few blog posts from jpwhiting:
juk
Music player
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- mpyne?
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Anyone else?
- There is initial porting work at github.com/KapiX/juk/commits/kf5
- Are we able to merge work from github? If not, someone should inform the author.
- [tosky] the author came to #kde-devel few weeks ago, so maybe we can reping him
kaccessible
- Question: Do we need this or Qt5 accessibility is all we need in this regard?
kppp
- One user "complained" at Gardening mailing list
- https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-gardening/2017-July/000142.html
- can't Network Manager / Modem Manager do this?
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
kremotecontrol
Frontend for remote controls
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- mzanetti?
- [email protected]
- [email protected]
- Anyone else?
- There was already a thread on kde-utils-devel (https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-utils-devel/2017-July/004049.html) to move it to unmaintained.
ksaneplugin
- Not important, let it die
kfilereplace
Utility to assist with bulk file renaming
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
klinkstatus
Tool to check the current status of links in a web page
- Who do we ask if they want to port it?
- As far as I remember, the original author (Paulo) was interested to do (or help with) the port
Repos WITH frameworks branch
kget
- What is the status?
kimagemapeditor
- What is the status?
- [tosky] mostly working, requires some testing from people who used it more than me; a lot of kdelibs4support to be removed, but not a blocker
kmouth
- What is the status?
- [tosky] working; waiting on a stable QtSpeech (discussed on the distribution list, but between having no application at all (0 users) and an application dependending on an unstable-but-almost-stable library (some users), the latter is probably better.
kolf
- What is the status?
- [tosky] it seems to be working; Frederik Schwarzer expressed some concerns while reviewing kdelibs4-based games about the embedded copy of Box2D, maybe it can be removed, but maybe it's not a blocker for merging frameworks into master.
kopete
- for some reason branch is called kf5
- What is the status?
kscd
- for some reason branch is called kf5
- What is the status?
- [tosky] mostly working, but requires more restesting; there is a pending patch for musicbrainz5 support, which is not strictly a blocker, but it should be cleaned (some cmake files can be rewritten in a simpler way, or reimported from their newer versions, or shared): https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127196/
ksirk
- Master branch is KF5-based as of now, needs testing
palapeli
- What is the status?
- [tosky] it starts, but tiles are not loaded; debug needed
sweeper
- What is the status?
- - One review is open (https://phabricator.kde.org/D5677), after that the frameworks branch should be ready for merging into master.
zeroconf-ioslave
- What is the status?
- [tosky] it starts, but I found it difficult to test zeroconf in general, so I'm not sure if it works or not.
Weird repos
kmix
KF5 is in master but not default
- Can we make KF5 default?
- [tosky] a lot of work went into the pure KF5 branch ("frameworks") lately. With the last fixes by Jonathan Marten it should work; testing needed.
umbrello
KF5 is in master, but also has kdelibs4 code
- Can we remove kdelibs4 code?