Akademy/Handbook/Program committee: Difference between revisions
(add program committee page) |
(How the Programming Committee will evaluate talks submissions for 2024) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* 5 to 10 people for the program committee | * 5 to 10 people for the program committee | ||
* program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule | * program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule | ||
== Talks Evaluation Criteria (2024) == | |||
=== Relevance to KDE === | |||
* Is this talk related to KDE work or something more generic/external? | |||
=== Interest to KDE === | |||
* On internal projects, weigh "importance" to KDE, e.g. rating a talk regarding porting Frameworks to Qt6 higher than a random plasma widget. | |||
* If an external topic is in question, is this something that our community would be interested in? | |||
=== Speaker === | |||
* Are they known? Do they have interesting insights to share? Can they give a good talk? | |||
* Does our potential lineup reflect the diversity of the KDE community? | |||
=== Topic === | |||
* If we have submissions on similar topics, there's an option to suggest a merge of talks (and we can ask submitters to work together on one or do a panel) | |||
* If there are many submissions on the same topic, try to solicit talks on different topics or focus (i.e. if there's a lot of technical talks, solicit some related to organizing/planning/achievements). | |||
== Additional info == | == Additional info == | ||
Revision as of 10:32, 3 April 2024
Goal
We want an interesting, inspiring and useful program for Akademy. The program committee is tasked with putting the program together.
Needs
- 5 to 10 people for the program committee
- program committee facilitator to move the process along and support the committee in putting together the schedule
Talks Evaluation Criteria (2024)
Relevance to KDE
- Is this talk related to KDE work or something more generic/external?
Interest to KDE
- On internal projects, weigh "importance" to KDE, e.g. rating a talk regarding porting Frameworks to Qt6 higher than a random plasma widget.
- If an external topic is in question, is this something that our community would be interested in?
Speaker
- Are they known? Do they have interesting insights to share? Can they give a good talk?
- Does our potential lineup reflect the diversity of the KDE community?
Topic
- If we have submissions on similar topics, there's an option to suggest a merge of talks (and we can ask submitters to work together on one or do a panel)
- If there are many submissions on the same topic, try to solicit talks on different topics or focus (i.e. if there's a lot of technical talks, solicit some related to organizing/planning/achievements).
Additional info
- -