User talk:Nmariusp: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipeline_(Unix) uses a ton of <nowiki>"<code>"</nowiki>. So maybe your knowledge about mediawiki + <nowiki>"<code>"</nowiki> is not perfect. | 4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipeline_(Unix) uses a ton of <nowiki>"<code>"</nowiki>. So maybe your knowledge about mediawiki + <nowiki>"<code>"</nowiki> is not perfect. | ||
::> I do not inline styles, so I will delete your words. | |||
::This is not how discussions work. At all. This is not how edits are made. | |||
::Also, can you please ''always'' fill in the edit summary. I see you do it sometimes, and sometimes not. I guess you should understand how important is keeping the history in the good state. | |||
::Contributions to wiki are welcome. But they should be of good quality. Just want to ask you to keep the edits in good style. | |||
::I do not want to argue about anything, but at least my editing knowledge allows me to not edit other speaker's text, do proper indents, etc. [[User:Ashark|Ashark]] ([[User talk:Ashark|talk]]) 21:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC). | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 4 November 2023
Avoid using tags in wiki markup
Hi. We currently do not have a page with editing guidelines. We will prepare it later.
But can you please aviod using direct html tags in wiki markup. Such as <pre>, <div>, <code> and so on. Please use proper wiki syntax, using templates. Ashark (talk) 14:54, 2 November 2023 (UTC)
I do not inline styles, so I will delete your words.
> Please use proper wiki syntax, using templates.
1. This smells like the wiki page will not be portable to other mediawiki instances.
2. The fact that mediawiki markup diverges more and more from markdown is unfortunate.
3. I still prefer the look of source code blocks without any syntax highlighting.
4. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pipeline_(Unix) uses a ton of "<code>". So maybe your knowledge about mediawiki + "<code>" is not perfect.
- > I do not inline styles, so I will delete your words.
- This is not how discussions work. At all. This is not how edits are made.
- Also, can you please always fill in the edit summary. I see you do it sometimes, and sometimes not. I guess you should understand how important is keeping the history in the good state.
- Contributions to wiki are welcome. But they should be of good quality. Just want to ask you to keep the edits in good style.
- I do not want to argue about anything, but at least my editing knowledge allows me to not edit other speaker's text, do proper indents, etc. Ashark (talk) 21:32, 4 November 2023 (UTC).