Talk:Policies/Commit Policy: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Sign unsigned comments, reformat, add title) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Use case for FEATURE and BUG == | |||
I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:? | I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:? | ||
Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive? | Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive? {{Unsigned|19:03 10 November 2020 (UTC)|Bam}} | ||
:Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both. {{Unsigned|22:48 12 November 2020 (UTC)|Cornelius}} | |||
Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both. | |||
Latest revision as of 15:17, 28 November 2023
Use case for FEATURE and BUG
I'm not sure about use case for FEATURE: keyword, what differentiate it from BUG:? Is there a case when both those could be used, or are they mutually exclusive? —This unsigned comment is by Bam (talk) 19:03 10 November 2020 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
- Functionality-wise the keywords are mostly the same, they differentiate in what kind of change they describe. An atomic fix mostly will have only one of them. If there is a commit which contains multiple changes it might be adequate to add both. —This unsigned comment is by Cornelius (talk) 22:48 12 November 2020 (UTC). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!