KReport/API Changes: Difference between revisions
< KReport
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
Usage in unit tests: KReportDesign, KReportDocument, KReportWriter (impl.) are first classes for autotesting. See [[../Autotests/]] for scenarios. | Usage in unit tests: KReportDesign, KReportDocument, KReportWriter (impl.) are first classes for autotesting. See [[../Autotests/]] for scenarios. | ||
==TODO== | |||
*Rename KoReportReportData, it's not about data | |||
==Notes== | ==Notes== | ||
*During the API changes we have opportunity to rename Ko* prefixes to KReport too | *During the API changes we have opportunity to rename Ko* prefixes to KReport too |
Revision as of 10:28, 29 July 2015
Design creation
Started: Jstaniek (talk) 08:59, 29 July 2015 (UTC)
The goal: Make it possible to create, modify, open and save KReport designs without touching the designer API.
New classes and relations between them proposed:
- KReportDesign: setContent(xml) loads, toString() saves, modelled after
- We don't use KReportDocument name for this because actual document is: design+data
- Addressed issue: .kreport format loading happened in KoReportDesigner's ctor without proper error reporting
- KReportDocument: design+data so it's more or less takes KReportDesign and KReportData args.
- KReportDocument can be rendered on a KReportWriter
- KReportWriter is equivalent of QImageWriter, can use files or QIODevices
- Inherit KReportWriter to implement what we so far call 'renderers'
- KReportDocument+KReportWriter is like QPainter+QPaintDevice
- Current API solutions are not the best, e.g. see KoReportRendererContext
[KReportDesign] >--builds-[KReportDocument]-->-is-used-in-[KReportWriter]--writes-to--[File/Screen/Printer] [ KReportData ]
Usage in unit tests: KReportDesign, KReportDocument, KReportWriter (impl.) are first classes for autotesting. See Autotests for scenarios.
TODO
- Rename KoReportReportData, it's not about data
Notes
- During the API changes we have opportunity to rename Ko* prefixes to KReport too