KDEEdu/Sprint2012: Difference between revisions
< KDEEdu
mNo edit summary |
mNo edit summary |
||
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
** Documentation of the project, even software architectures? | ** Documentation of the project, even software architectures? | ||
** How to get the best code out from not primarily programmers, but scientists? | ** How to get the best code out from not primarily programmers, but scientists? | ||
** Continous Integration and Jenkins, something missing? | |||
Revision as of 12:06, 11 September 2012
General Information
Randa Sprint in sprints.kde.org
Agenda
- KDE Edu on Windows
- How to attract contributors to fix runtime or build issues on Windows?
- Can we distribute on their market?
- What will happen with Metro+KDE?
- KDE Edu on Mobile
- What projects should be ported?
- Do we want different versions for the Mobile version?
- Should they be available for free on the platform markets?
- Localization issues?
- How to advertise KDE Edu better in mobile softwares?
- How to improve app-in purchase like a new translation? Porting GHNS or something else?
- How can we lower the barrier to get into mobile tasks?
- Website
- State?
- What's missing?
- How can we improve it?
- Plasma Active
- How can we make sure we are a first citizen on the project?
- How can we take advantage from it?
- Quality
- Code testing coverage?
- Testing? More collaboration with the Quality team and teachers to test new releases?
- Documentation of the project, even software architectures?
- How to get the best code out from not primarily programmers, but scientists?
- Continous Integration and Jenkins, something missing?
- Artwork, UI Design, and Usability
- Do we have something we can do better for attracting such contributors?
- How can we do this better ourselves when we have a lack of expertise around? What guidelines should we consider?
- Any lessons learned from previous mobile efforts or from desktop?
- Qt5 and KDE Frameworks
- Worth starting?
- Are there contributors for porting and experimenting?